Sumerian · 9 min read
Nanna Sails to Nibru
He fixed his mind on the city of his father
The moon had a father, and the father lived upriver. In the old Sumerian poem the moon god is called Nanna, and also Suen, and also Ashimbabbar. He fixed his mind on the city of his mother and his father, and then said it himself, eight lines of it. I will set off to my father Enlil. I will set off to my mother Ninlil. The repetition is not padding. It is a decision being held steady.
The city was Nibru, which later ages called Nippur, and he praised it before leaving home: the shining city, the pure place, where palm trees grew before Dilmun existed. Six lines break off in the middle of that praise, and what comes back is one phrase, four times over: very great.
A barge made of far places
He did not simply travel. He built. He sent people to Tummal for the barge's reeds, to the abzu for its pitch, to the forests of Ebla for its planking. By the time it sat in the water the boat had carried nothing yet and was already full of far places.
Between the timber and the cargo, sixty-odd lines of tablet are lost, so we never see the boat finished. What comes back is a voice saying I am Nanna-Suen, I will go to the house of Enlil, and then a list. Bulls, fattened sheep, porcupines, long-tailed bush-rats, carp, baskets of eggs, old reed and fresh reed. Six hundred ewes brought to lamb, six hundred she-goats to kid, six hundred cows to calve. Every line ends the same way: for the house of Enlil.
I am going to Nibru
Then the river. Each stop is named by the two cities it lies between, one ahead of the boat and one behind. Urim, the city we call Ur, lies behind at the first landing and further behind at every one after. Enegir lay ahead, and Ningirida brought out of the house what should not come out of the house. Welcome, welcome, welcome o boat.
She laid out flour before the barge and spread bran, and a covered bronze vat stood at her feet. May ghee and syrup and wine be abundant in your midst, she said, and the carp rejoice at your prow. Nothing she brings is a trick. That is the difficulty of the poem. The refusal, when it comes, is not even his: the poem hands it to the boat. But the boat did not give her its cargo: I am going to Nibru.
At Unug, later called Uruk, it was Inanna, his daughter, and she hailed it as the boat of my father. The boat did not give her its cargo. The poem offers no reason and no reproach, only a shape: a daughter with her arms full at the bank, and a father already going past.
At Tummal, the last landing before Nibru, it was the fair Ninlil, his own mother, hailing the boat of the princely son. The reeds his barge was built from had been fetched from Tummal. She offered what the others had offered, and the boat answered as before. Five landings, five welcomes, and the same short sentence every time, until it stops sounding like a plan and starts sounding like something held with both hands.
Open the house, Kalkal
At the Shining Quay, the quay of Enlil, Nanna-Suen finally docked the boat. He stepped up to his father's house and called out to the porter. Open the house, porter. Open the house, Kalkal. Doorman, doorkeeper, open the house.
He kept calling. He read the whole manifest out, and after every item said the same thing: porter, open the house. Then he offered him what was in the prow as a first offering and what was in the stern as a last. Rejoicing, the porter rejoicing, the porter rejoicing opened the house. The poem says the word three times over, because at last there is something to repeat that is not a refusal.
What he asked for Urim
Enlil was glad of the offerings and put bread in front of his son. Give sweet cakes to my little fellow who eats sweet cakes, he said. Give sweet cakes to my Nanna who loves eating sweet cakes. He fed him the way you feed someone who has come a long way to sit down.
Suen said he was satisfied. Then he asked, and the refrain turned around: every landing on the way up had ended with Nibru, and each of his eight requests ends with home. In the river give me the carp-flood, and I want to set off for Urim. In the fields, speckled barley. In the marshes, carp. In the reedbeds, old reed and fresh reed. In the forests, the ibex and wild ram. In the high plain, the mashgurum tree. In the orchards, syrup and wine. In the palace, long life.
His father gave him all of it, and after every gift the poem says the same thing: and he set off for Urim. He came up the river giving nothing away, and goes back down it carrying everything he came for.
You do not have to arrive tonight. The barge is tied at the quay, the door is open, the asking is finished and the answer was yes. Let the river carry the light back down without you. Whatever you are travelling toward will still be there in the morning.
About this telling
The Sumerian composition Nanna-Suen's journey to Nibru (ETCSL 1.5.1)
This retelling follows the Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature's composite translation of Nanna-Suen's journey to Nibru. The poem stages five identical greetings, and three are kept here: Ningirida at Enegir, who sets the pattern; Inanna at Unug, who greets the barge as her father's; and the fair Ninlil at Tummal, his own mother, at the last landing before Nibru. Sherida at Larsa and Ninunuga at Shuruppag are left out only because five turns of one unchanging scene will not fit in eight hundred words, and nothing in their episodes differs from the others. Each goddess belongs to the city that lies ahead of the boat rather than the one behind it, so the roster runs Enegir, Larsa, Unug, Shuruppag, Tummal, with no episode at Urim, which is where he starts. The goddesses are given no words the tablet does not give them. What the boat refuses is not their food but the handing over of its cargo, and the source puts that refusal in the boat's mouth rather than Nanna's; both are kept. The carp in their blessing are a wish for the voyage, not a gift taken aboard. The catalogues of timber, livestock and offerings are condensed; the poem gives them in full and then again at the door. The four-line blessing on a king that ends the composition is not included. Two phrases here come from outside the poem and are flagged for that reason: it never calls Nanna-Suen a moon god, which is the standard identification and is carried by the Oracc article cited below, and it never says upriver, only which city lies ahead of the boat and which behind, although Urim does lie downstream of Nibru. Names that survive only inside broken lines are left out rather than given parts to play. ETCSL writes the Sumerian sh as c, so its Acimbabbar, Cerida, Curuppag and macgurum appear here as Ashimbabbar, Sherida, Shuruppag and mashgurum, and its Inana is given as the site's Inanna. Nibru, Urim and Unug are glossed as Nippur, Ur and Uruk on first use. Nothing in this poem needed softening: it contains no violence, grief or coercion.
Version note
First Mythic Dream edition, source-checked 23 August 2026 against the ETCSL composite translation of composition 1.5.1 and its manuscript bibliography. The translation was adapted and proofread between 1998 and 2000 at Oxford; a 2001 revision reformatted the file without changing its content. The composition runs to 352 lines and the tablets are damaged in several places: six lines are missing inside Nanna's own praise of Nibru, leaving only the phrase very great repeated four times; one line is fragmentary at the end of the boat-building, and then lines 83 to 146 are missing or fragmentary between the arrival of the timbers and his declaration that he will go to the house of Enlil; five further lines are lost before the offerings are listed. Ellipses stand in many surviving lines, including several items of the cargo. None of those gaps is filled in here. The refusal, I am going to Nibru, stands five times in the surviving translation, once at each city, not ten. Enlil grants eight things for Urim, not nine: the carp-flood, speckled barley, carp, old reed and fresh reed, the ibex and wild ram, the mashgurum tree, syrup and wine, and long life. The bibliography lists twenty-nine cuneiform manuscript entries, several of them joins of separate fragments, and heads its print sources with A. J. Ferrara, Nanna-Suen's Journey to Nippur (Studia Pohl Series Major 2, Rome, 1973). One name is disputed: ETCSL reads the moon god's third name as Acimbabbar, while the Oracc reference article prefers Dilimbabbar and marks Ashimbabbar obsolete. This telling keeps the ETCSL form, since ETCSL is the text it follows.
Sources
Sources guide the factual spine of each retelling. The prose is original to Mythic Dream.
- Nanna-Suen's journey to Nibru: translation — J. A. Black, G. Cunningham, E. Robson and G. Zolyomi (eds.), Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature, University of Oxford
The primary text. A scholarly composite translation with line numbering, manuscript variants and every gap marked in place. It supplies the declarations of intent and the praise of Nibru, the barge's materials and where each was fetched from, the cargo assembled for the house of Enlil, the five greeting episodes with the goddess named at each, the blessing spoken over the hold, the refrain that the boat did not give her its cargo, the porter Kalkal at the Shining Quay, Enlil's sweet cakes, and the eight things granted for Urim.
- Nanna-Suen's journey to Nibru: bibliography and cuneiform sources — Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature, University of Oxford
The apparatus behind the composite text: the print editions used, headed by A. J. Ferrara's 1973 Nanna-Suen's Journey to Nippur with composite text, translation, photograph, handcopy and commentary, alongside the Bottero and Kramer French translation and a Wilcke review; the electronic sources; and the twenty-nine cuneiform manuscript entries the composite is built from, whose sigla are how the extent of the damaged passages can be checked.
- Nanna/Suen/Sin (god) — Adam Stone, Ancient Mesopotamian Gods and Goddesses, Oracc and the UK Higher Education Academy
Reference article on the moon god, used only for what sits outside the poem: that he is the Mesopotamian moon god, called Nanna in Sumerian and Su'en or Sin in Akkadian, that he was the tutelary deity of Ur, that Inana is counted among his children, that the third name is attested only in literary texts, and that the etymologies of Nanna and Su'en remain unclear.